Whenever the requirements are met, the workers who lose their employment can access the contributory provision for unemployment of the Public State Employment Service (SEPE), better known as the ‘unemployment’. This help can be charged up to a maximum of 2 years and, for many, it is not sufficiently monitored, considering that many people prefer to subsist with this benefit instead of looking for work.
The business, fiscal and labor advisor María Pilar Dancausa is one of these voices, using her social networks on more than one occasion to denounce that there are people who abuse this help. Thus, his opinion is very sharp: “I would eliminate unemployment because it only creates vague.”
Then, disassembles one of the myths of unemployment, ensuring that the argument that what has been quoted is charged is not exactly like this: “Many say, ‘I have the right to collect unemployment because for that I have been paying it during every month’. Do you know how much you really pay for unemployment? 1.55% of your gross salary.”
On this, it gives an example, ensuring Dancausa that if you charge 10,000 euros gross, by unemployment 21.70 would be paid, “that over a year is about 200 euros and in 3 years 782”.
“Who will pay it to you?”
Following the latter, this advisor affects that “for all who say, ‘I have the right to collect unemployment because for that I have paid it every month’, what do you think if you really after 3 years worked pay you the strike? Yes, what you have paid, 782 euros, or do you still want to charge a full year?”.
A reflection that ends equally clear: “And who will pay you? I don’t.” His video reaped more than 7,500 comments with reactions of all kinds: “I would eliminate life payments to former presidents, and the contribution to the church of 11,000 million euros a year. Do you agree?”, And the one who works forty years and does not charge the unemployment. living ”, are some of them.